Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Beaufort West. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Beaufort West. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Beaufort West. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Beaufort West. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: This layer provides both a summary and a detailed list of biodiversity and ecological infrastructure features found in each unit selected as CBA or ESA, and to which the unit makes a quantifiable contribution to the target.
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Bergrivier. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Bergrivier. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Bergrivier. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Bergrivier. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: This layer provides both a summary and a detailed list of biodiversity and ecological infrastructure features found in each unit selected as CBA or ESA, and to which the unit makes a quantifiable contribution to the target.
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Bitou. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Bitou. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Bitou. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Bitou. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: This layer provides both a summary and a detailed list of biodiversity and ecological infrastructure features found in each unit selected as CBA or ESA, and to which the unit makes a quantifiable contribution to the target.
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Breede Valley. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Breede Valley. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Breede Valley. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Breede Valley. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: This layer provides both a summary and a detailed list of biodiversity and ecological infrastructure features found in each unit selected as CBA or ESA, and to which the unit makes a quantifiable contribution to the target.
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Cape Agulhas. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Cape Agulhas. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Cape Agulhas. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Cape Agulhas. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: This layer provides both a summary and a detailed list of biodiversity and ecological infrastructure features found in each unit selected as CBA or ESA, and to which the unit makes a quantifiable contribution to the target.
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Cederberg. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Cederberg. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Cederberg. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Cederberg. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: This layer provides both a summary and a detailed list of biodiversity and ecological infrastructure features found in each unit selected as CBA or ESA, and to which the unit makes a quantifiable contribution to the target.
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Drakenstein. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Drakenstein. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Drakenstein. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Drakenstein. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: This layer provides both a summary and a detailed list of biodiversity and ecological infrastructure features found in each unit selected as CBA or ESA, and to which the unit makes a quantifiable contribution to the target.
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for George. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for George. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for George. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for George. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: This layer provides both a summary and a detailed list of biodiversity and ecological infrastructure features found in each unit selected as CBA or ESA, and to which the unit makes a quantifiable contribution to the target.
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Hessequa. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Hessequa. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Hessequa. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Hessequa. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: This layer provides both a summary and a detailed list of biodiversity and ecological infrastructure features found in each unit selected as CBA or ESA, and to which the unit makes a quantifiable contribution to the target.
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Kannaland. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Kannaland. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Kannaland. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Kannaland. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: This layer provides both a summary and a detailed list of biodiversity and ecological infrastructure features found in each unit selected as CBA or ESA, and to which the unit makes a quantifiable contribution to the target.
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Knysna. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Knysna. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Knysna. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Knysna. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: This layer provides both a summary and a detailed list of biodiversity and ecological infrastructure features found in each unit selected as CBA or ESA, and to which the unit makes a quantifiable contribution to the target.
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Laingsburg. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Laingsburg. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Laingsburg. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Laingsburg. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: This layer provides both a summary and a detailed list of biodiversity and ecological infrastructure features found in each unit selected as CBA or ESA, and to which the unit makes a quantifiable contribution to the target.
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Langeberg. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Langeberg. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Langeberg. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Langeberg. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: This layer provides both a summary and a detailed list of biodiversity and ecological infrastructure features found in each unit selected as CBA or ESA, and to which the unit makes a quantifiable contribution to the target.
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Matzikama. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Matzikama. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Matzikama. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Matzikama. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: This layer provides both a summary and a detailed list of biodiversity and ecological infrastructure features found in each unit selected as CBA or ESA, and to which the unit makes a quantifiable contribution to the target.
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Mossel Bay. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Mossel Bay. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Mossel Bay. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Mossel Bay. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: This layer provides both a summary and a detailed list of biodiversity and ecological infrastructure features found in each unit selected as CBA or ESA, and to which the unit makes a quantifiable contribution to the target.
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Oudtshoorn. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Oudtshoorn. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Oudtshoorn. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Oudtshoorn. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: This layer provides both a summary and a detailed list of biodiversity and ecological infrastructure features found in each unit selected as CBA or ESA, and to which the unit makes a quantifiable contribution to the target.
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Overstrand. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Overstrand. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Overstrand. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Overstrand. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: This layer provides both a summary and a detailed list of biodiversity and ecological infrastructure features found in each unit selected as CBA or ESA, and to which the unit makes a quantifiable contribution to the target.
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Prince Albert. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Prince Albert. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Prince Albert. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Prince Albert. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: This layer provides both a summary and a detailed list of biodiversity and ecological infrastructure features found in each unit selected as CBA or ESA, and to which the unit makes a quantifiable contribution to the target.
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Saldanha Bay. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Saldanha Bay. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Saldanha Bay. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Saldanha Bay. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: This layer provides both a summary and a detailed list of biodiversity and ecological infrastructure features found in each unit selected as CBA or ESA, and to which the unit makes a quantifiable contribution to the target.
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Stellenbosch. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Stellenbosch. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Stellenbosch. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Stellenbosch. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: This layer provides both a summary and a detailed list of biodiversity and ecological infrastructure features found in each unit selected as CBA or ESA, and to which the unit makes a quantifiable contribution to the target.
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Swartland. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Swartland. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Swartland. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Swartland. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: This layer provides both a summary and a detailed list of biodiversity and ecological infrastructure features found in each unit selected as CBA or ESA, and to which the unit makes a quantifiable contribution to the target.
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Swellendam. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Swellendam. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Swellendam. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Swellendam. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: This layer provides both a summary and a detailed list of biodiversity and ecological infrastructure features found in each unit selected as CBA or ESA, and to which the unit makes a quantifiable contribution to the target.
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Theewaterskloof. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Theewaterskloof. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Theewaterskloof. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Theewaterskloof. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: This layer provides both a summary and a detailed list of biodiversity and ecological infrastructure features found in each unit selected as CBA or ESA, and to which the unit makes a quantifiable contribution to the target.
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Witzenberg. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) for Witzenberg. A further distinction is made between CBAs that are likely to be in a natural condition (CBA1) and those that are potentially degraded or represent secondary vegetation (CBA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Witzenberg. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) for Witzenberg. A distinction is made between ESAs that are likely to be functional (i.e., in a natural, near-natural or moderately degraded condition; ESA1), and Ecological Support Areas that are likely severely degraded or have no natural cover remaining and therefore require restoration where feasible (ESA2).
Description: This layer provides both a summary and a detailed list of biodiversity and ecological infrastructure features found in each unit selected as CBA or ESA, and to which the unit makes a quantifiable contribution to the target.